Genetically modified food †Allergy Essay

Genetic all toldy modified foods atomic number 18 becoming more and more utilise in our community. But, they are non as dependable as batch feign them to be. genetically modified foods brush off coif a big problem in the world, sluice if it hatful produce crowing quantities of foods, it is found that it can ca do drugs abuse an allergy to certain foods, legion(predicate) an(prenominal) scientists had voted to ban them and thither non always designate that its a GMO. Therefore, they should be abolished within the world. To chute off, the fact that there is a chemical substance that is produced that can pretend allergic reactions to most masses.The scientist had declared that the chemical is safe to use But the biotech companies and the Environmental Protection meanswhich regulates plant produced pesticidestell us not to worry. They contend that the pesticide called Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) is produced naturally from a discoloration bacterium and has a hist ory of safe use. ( smith). The counter argument was proof that this chemical is actually not safe to use, it can make a person sicker than presumed.Jeffery Smith stated Repeated exposure via ingestion can result in sensitising and allergic response in hypersensitised individuals. So much for the contention that Bt does not interact with humans. (Smith). I have been allergic to onions since I was twelve years old, this could be eccentricd by the chemical Bt. If the Scientists saying that is drug is harmless theyre wrong because its been proven that this chemical can cause an increase in allergies. Therefore, maybe if we had all natural food growths than maybe I could eat onions now. That is wherefore GMOs should be abolished.There are so many GMOs that are not even labeled as that how people ever have what their eating if its not labeled. Its the people have a upright to know whats going in there body. Without sharing that information its bad for the people to trust anything that is not farmers. Granted some people seizet care, notwithstanding there are people who do. In an article by Peter Sand he states Hence, in CCFL sessions since 1997,57 the EU and other food importers such as Norway consistently argued that the declared uncomplicated purpose of their GM food labeling regulations is not a health risk warning, but information to enable consumers to exercise their license of choice. (Sand)Its not that the food is tout ensemble unsafe that is the problem of not verbalise them that its genetically modified, the problem is that its breaking some freedom laws. If a person doesnt knows most anything how they can make any decision nearly it. And my final point is that even scientist in some countries signed a appeal to ban GMOs from their country. A letter was presented at the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in 1999.Ed Ayres stated that The letter expresses extreme concern about the hazards of GMOs to biodiversity, food safety, and human and animal health, and recommends a global moratorium on environmental releases of GMOs in accordance with the precautionary principle (Ayres). So even some scientists would like to ban GMOs, How can that make any superstar if all GMOs are safe why do scientists want to ban them. When many people whom specialize in that case dont want it in the country why should any comely citizen of any country.It should be abolished if even the people creating it say it should be banned. Not to reboot they want to ban it for the safety of people and animals. In conclusion, genetically modified foods cause an increasing problem with the allergy footstep increasing, scientist wanting to ban them, and not even telling anyone that they are genetically modified. This could call for to a bigger problem with in the world and it should be stopped now. Genetically modified foods should be abolished within the world.